Skip to main content
· 4/23/2020

James Charnquist v. New Stream Real Estate, LLC, F/K/A Charter Oak Real Estate Fund, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding even though the court relied on a parent’s most current income information, it did so improperly, because the information was not before the commissioner
  • stating that a parent cannot avoid child support by remaining voluntarily unemployed or underemployed
  • declining to award attorney fees where neither party was the substantially prevailing party
  • declining to award attorney fees where neither party was the substantially prevailing party
  • “Generally, a superior court judge’s review of a court commissioner’s ruling, pursuant to a motion for revision, is limited to the evidence and issues presented to the commissioner.”
  • In child support proceedings, “[i]t is error for the superior court to consider additional evidence on revision.” Instead, the superior court “may remand the case to the commissioner to consider the additional information.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.