· 3/2/2005
James Carroll and Eleanor Carroll, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. United Compucred Collections, Inc. And A.B. Stineman
Citations
- 399 F.3d 620
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 3474
- 2005 WL 474719
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a complete offer of judgment to the named plaintiff did not moot the action where the motion to certify was previously filed, fully briefed, and approved by the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge
- relying on New Hampshire v. Maine and noting that “the second factor-that a court accepted the party's initial position-appears to be significant”
- relying on New Hampshire v. Maine and noting that “the second factor-that a court accepted the party's initial position-appears to be significant”
- two named plaintiffs received $1,100 each, while class with 164 members split $10,000, receiving about $60 each
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clay, Gilman, O'Malley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.