James C. Svela v. Union Oil Company of California, a California Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Congress did not intend for courts to intrude into the marketplace by permitting “judicial second-guessing of the economic decisions of franchisors”
• noting that Congress did not intend for courts to intrude into the marketplace by permitting “judicial second-guessing of the economic decisions of franchisors”
• holding \franchisor bears the burden of establishing as an affirmative defense that 21 nonrenewal was permitted under one of the statutorily enumerated grounds\
• holding \franchisor bears the burden of 24 establishing as an affirmative defense that nonrenewal was permitted under one of the 25 statutorily enumerated grounds\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).