James C. Sarlund v. Jeffrey M. Anderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when plaintiff’s fugitive status places him entirely beyond judicial control, thus creating a situation severely prejudicial to his adversaries, fugitive disentitlement doctrine bars action and requires dismissal with prejudice
• applying the doctrine where the plaintiffs fugitive status created a situation severely prejudicial to his adversaries
• section 1983 claims may be barred by Younger abstention when a plaintiff seeks to derail an ongoing probation revocation proceeding
• section 1983 claims may be barred by Younger abstention when a plaintiff seeks to derail an ongoing probation revocation proceeding
• “Many of the plaintiff’s claims are barred . . . by the spirit of the Younger doctrine, since he is trying to derail an ongoing . . . revocation proceeding.” (citing Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).