James C. Robinson v. National Transportation Safety Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an agency cannot “ignore . . . testimony” directly relevant to “a critical fact” in controversy
• noting that agency may not ignore testimony bearing on critical fact in case
• “An agency conclusion may be supported by substantial evidence even though a plausible alternative interpretation of the evidence would support a contrary view.”
• agency may not ignore testimony bearing on critical fact in case
• both noting the propriety of relying on circumstantial evidence in administrative adjudicatory proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).