James C. Rayner v. Daniel W. Smirl Csx Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that a more inclusive interpretation of \employee\ is warranted for the whistleblower provisions in the Federal Railway Safety Act, aimed at promoting rail safety
• stating that “[s]uch reasons cannot justify a similarly broad reading of FLSA, which ... was not enacted specifically out of concern for the physical safety of the public at large.... ”
• interpreting complaint clause in the Federal Railroad Safety Act, 45 U.S.C. S 441(a) (repealed 1994), to include intra-corporate complaints
• interpreting Federal Railroad Safety Authorization Act to protect whistleblowers in making intra-corporate complaints even though the act itself did not explicitly provide such protection
• interpreting complaint clause in the Federal Railroad Safety Act, 45 U.S.C. § 441(a) (repealed 1994), to include intra-corporate complaints
• “Section 441 [of Title 45] clearly is a law ‘relating to railroad safety’ under § 434”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).