James C. Ray and Ronald Craiger v. Mitchell Young

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant union officer must prove that funds or property were obtained with “valid authorization” pursuant to “informed disclosure”
• increase in cost of providing benefit plan amounting to $9000 over a period of several years not “manifestly unreasonable” in light of official’s salary of $700 per week
• union official’s failure to disclose dual reimbursement of expenses negated authorization by membership under heightened scrutiny applicable where there is a direct benefit to official; liability established under Section 501
• concept of personal benefit should not be narrowly construed
• concept of personal benefit should not be narrowly construed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).