James C. Hobbs v. United States of America, Atomic Energy Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the court “cannot attach any relevance to any conditions of secrecy which may have existed at the time the [invention] was placed ‘on sale.’ ”
• \quantum of proof ... greater than a mere preponderance of the evidence\
• \(T)his Court has employed varying statements of the necessary quantum of proof.\
• “quantum of proof ... greater than a mere preponderance of the evidence”
• “[T]his Court has employed varying statements of the necessary quantum of proof.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).