James C. Conrad v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where a criminal procedural rule provided that the government “must take the defendant without unnecessary delay” before a judge, the “exercise of judgment” was required in determining “how much delay is necessary”
• finding district court lacked jurisdiction to hear a false imprisonment 16 claim pursuant to the discretionary function exception of the FTCA
• Under California law, “[t]he plaintiff can rebut the presumption ... by demonstrating that the indictment was procured on the basis of false testimony.”
• in an FTCA action, the law of the state in which the alleged tort occurred applies
• FTCA actions are governed by the substantive law of the state in which the alleged tort occurred
• FTCA actions are governed by the substantive law of the state in which the alleged tort occurred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Tekle Ex Rel. Tekle v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 2007-12-03· cited 143×
• Roberts v. McAfee, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2011-11-07· cited 67×
• Gonzalez Ex Rel. A.F. v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 2016-02-24· cited 67×
• Bolt v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 2007-12-03· cited 57×
• Soldano v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 2006-07-12· cited 42×
• Lay v. Pettengill, Novotny
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2011-11-23· cited 24×
• Mendia v. Garcia
  N.D. California· 2016-02-26· cited 10×
• Vargas Ramirez v. United States
  W.D. Washington· 2015-03-23· cited 5×
• Oberson v. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-01-30· cited 5×
• Backfire 2000 v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-04-14· cited 4×
• Oberson v. US DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE, FOREST SERV.
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-01-30· cited 1×
• Soldano v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 2006-07-11· cited 1×
• Moore v. City of Oakland
  N.D. California· 2017-03-16· cited 1×
• Abudiab v. City & County
  N.D. California· 2011-06-20· cited 1×
• Tekle v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 2007-12-03
• Orberson v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-01-30
• Watson v. Rocha
  Ninth Circuit· 2006-09-13
• Thuillard v. United Customs & Border Security
  Ninth Circuit· 2006-12-21
• United States v. Pramik
  Ninth Circuit· 2007-05-21
• Prestidge v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 2015-07-31

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Anderson v. City of Bessemer City
  Supreme Court· 1985-03-19· cited 11,658×
• United States v. Gaubert
  Supreme Court· 1991-03-26· cited 2,087×
• Berkovitz v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-13· cited 1,883×
• United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio Grandense
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-19· cited 1,618×
• Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & Oliker
  California Supreme Court· 1989-01-12· cited 472×
• McCarthy v. Mayo
  Ninth Circuit· 1987-09-14· cited 139×
• Sierra Club Foundation v. Graham
  California Court of Appeal· 1999-06-10· cited 88×
• GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant
  Ninth Circuit· 1998-03-27· cited 47×
• Ecker v. Raging Waters Group, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2001-03-23· cited 21×
• United States v. Roy Lee Jernigan
  Ninth Circuit· 1978-09-25· cited 20×
• Martin E. Trenouth v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 1985-07-02· cited 20×
• Williams v. Hartford Insurance
  California Court of Appeal· 1983-10-07· cited 20×