Skip to main content
· 8/7/1980

James Butler, Charlotte Butler v. Bobbie S. Pearson

Citations

  • 636 F.2d 526
  • 204 U.S. App. D.C. 254
  • 30 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 252
  • 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 15086

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • allowing the motion to be characterized as a Rule 60(b) motion because it states the elements of excusable neglect
  • “concept of proportionality demands that plaintiffs not be unfairly penalized for negligence of their attorney”
  • “Plaintiffs them selves suggest that an award of reasonable attorney’s fees would be a more appropriate sanction than dismissal. We agree.”
  • Rule 60(b) relief should be liberally allowed to mitigate the impact of counsel’s neglect
  • “[T]he concept of proportionality demands that plaintiffs not be unfairly penalized for negligence of their attorney. In these circumstances, we are persuaded that the drastic remedy of dismissal was disproportionate to the level of negligence shown.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robinson, Seventh, Swygert, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.