James Boyd v. Mickey Owen and Leslie Foott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a district court erred when it found a due process violation based on the state employer's failure to comply with investigatory regulations because, under Loudermill, \the requirement of due process is not defined by state rules and regulations\
• noting that “district court decisions have no weight as precedents and therefore cannot clearly establish a constitutional right”
• “The Supreme Court has made clear the requirement of due process is not defined by state rules and regulations, but is an independent determination.” (citing Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 541 (1985))
• “[A]ny arguments that are ... underdeveloped are deemed waived.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).