James Bowen v. Huntington Alloys Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• characterizing nearly identical provision as \expressly self-limiting\ and concluding it did not cover tortious conduct
• interpreting substantially similar choice-of-law provision and noting that “[t]he language does not indicate that North Dakota law would also cover tortious conduct or unfair acts inducing a breach of the contract” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).