Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
· 9/29/1987

James Borden v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Citations

  • 836 F.2d 4
  • 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 16836
  • 1987 WL 30089

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that appellant was entitled to a de novo review, “however, he was not entitled to a de novo review of an argument never raised”
  • holding that appellant was entitled to a de novo review, “however he was not entitled to a de novo review of an argument never raised”
  • holding that appellant was entitled to a de novo review, “however he was not entitled to a de novo review of an argument never raised”
  • holding that appellant was entitled to a de novo review, “however he was not entitled to a de novo review of an argument never raised”
  • holding that appellant was entitled to a de novo review, \however he was not entitled to a de novo review of an argument never raised\
  • holding that appellant was entitled to a de novo review, “however he was not entitled to a de novo review of an argument never raised”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell, Bownes, Torruella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.