James B. King, Director, Office of Personnel Management v. Raymond Alston, and Merit Systems Protection Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that compliance with the procedures of 5 U.S.C. § 7513(b) satisfies the minimum due process requirements to which an employee is entitled
• arguing that the recipients of his EEO class complaint already had access to the allegedly misappropri- ated information
• “[The employee] was ... able to focus his response ... rather than have to guess whether the agency’s action was based on disloyalty, unreliability, or other possible ground for suspension of access to classified information.” (emphasis added)
• similar suspension on the ground that the employee “‘may suffer from a medical con- dition which requires further investigation’” was sufficient because the employee could focus his response on his med- ical status

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).