James B. King, Director, Office of Personnel Management v. Daino H. Jerome, and Merit Systems Protection Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Board could not review agency determination notwithstanding the possible efficiency of such review because “it is not for the board to supplant the remedies Congress expressly provided or create new remedies which it believes Congress overlooked.”
• explaining that the Board’s authority to review an agency’s compliance with interim relief is limited to “whether the agency actually made an undue disruption determination and whether the employee has received appropriate pay and benefits”
• finding implicitly, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(d), that the interim relief provisions of the WPA and, by implication, all other such provisions constituted civil service laws, rules, or regulations appealable to the court by the Director of the Office of Personnel Management
• “The Special Counsel can investigate allegations of prohibited personnel practices, secure corrective action, and bring action against employees who commit such acts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).