James Arthur Jackson v. The Official Representatives and Employees of the Los Angeles Police Department in and for the County of Los Angeles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• collateral estoppel inapplicable because search and seizure claims not considered on merits in criminal trial
• validity of arrest never considered on its merits; thus judgment of conviction did not collaterally estop state prisoner in civil rights suit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).