James Appeal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• pronouncing that courts should construe election laws liberally so “[t]echnicalities should not be used to make the right of the voter insecure”
• stating that resolution of election controversies must begin with the inquiry “Was any specific provision of the Election Code violated?”
• stating that while our election statutes are to be “strictly enforced to prevent fraud,” they are “ordinarily … construed liberally in [J-59-2024] [MO: Mundy, J.] - 4 favor of the right to vote”
• Election Code “technicalities” are necessary for preservation of secrecy and purity of ballot
• In construing election laws, while courts must strictly enforce all provisions to prevent fraud, an overriding concern must be to be flexible in order to favor the right to vote.
• In construing election laws, while courts must strictly enforce all provisions to prevent fraud, an overriding concern must be to be flexible in order to favor the right to vote

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).