Skip to main content
· 8/21/1991

Federal Case

Citations

  • 942 F.2d 1254
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 19411

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting the basis of 7 federal jurisdiction must appear on the face of the plaintiff’s complaint and that removal is improper if premised solely upon an anticipated defense
  • “[T]he FDIC has raised a disputable issue of federal law regarding whether section 1823(e) and D’Oench apply to bar the debtors’ claims and the case should be retained in the federal courts for decision on the merits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.