James A. Rafac v. Jiangsu Linhai Power MacHinery Group Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• analyzing Nevada law, the state supreme court’s practice, and the court’s express statement that it had considered all of the documents in the record and determined that the requested relief was not warranted before determining that the denial was on the merits
• analyzing Nevada law, the state supreme court’s practice, and the court’s express statement that it had considered all of the documents in the record and determined that the requested relief was not warranted before determining that the denial was on the merits
• exhaustion requirement satisfied where petitioner raised constitutional 3 due process claim once before state supreme court, even where petitioner could have raised claim 4 a second time

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).