Skip to main content
· 1/9/1998

James A. O'COnnOr v. United States

Citations

  • 133 F.3d 548
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 269
  • 1998 WL 7358

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The idea behind [the successive motion provision] is that a prisoner is entitled to one, but only one, full and fair opportunity to wage a collateral attack.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Easterbrook, Manion

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.