· 5/5/1987
James A. Murray, Justin L. Murray and Joan M. Murray v. The United States
Citations
- 817 F.2d 1580
- 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 263
- 59 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1043
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment is not money-mandating
- stating that the Claims Court did not have jurisdiction because “there is no language in the statute requiring compensation”
- stating that the Claims Court did not have jurisdiction because “there is no language in the statute requiring compensation”
- noting that the Fifth Amendment Due Process clause does not include language mandating the payment of money damages
- noting that the Fifth Amendment Due Process clause does not include language mandating the payment of money damages
- noting that the Fifth Amendment Due Process clause does not include language mandating the payment of money damages
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Newman, Bissell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.