James A. Moore, Jr. v. ICG Tygart Valley, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a genuine issue of material fact as to whether plaintiff and defendant ever agreed to terms of a memorandum precluded summary judgment
• finding a dispute of material fact where deposition testimony differed as to whether there was a specific agreement
• fact is “material” when it might affect the outcome of the suit under the governing substantive law
• summary judgment may not be granted where “a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party” (quoting Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 (1986)
• summary judgment may not be granted where “a -20- reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party” (quoting Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 (1986)
• summary judgment not appropriate where reasonable trier of fact could rule for non-moving party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).