Skip to main content
· 4/15/1994

James A. Long v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General

Citations

  • 22 F.3d 54
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 8026
  • 64 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,984
  • 64 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 782

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that equitable tolling is not applicable even if the EEOC’s notice was not “a model of clarity”
  • stating that “ambiguity of the EEOC notice does not ... amount to affirmative misconduct” by the government
  • stating that failure to comply with the time limitations warrants dismissal of the complaint
  • affirming the district’s court denial of equitable tolling, in part, because the plaintiff was represented by counsel at the relevant time
  • stating that equitable tolling applies to Age Discrimination in Employment Act
  • noting that equitable tolling “developed in the context of fraud”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miner, Walker, Munson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.