James A. Latham, Marian E. Latham, Movant-Appellant v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Rule 60(b) simply may not be used as an end run to effect an appeal outside the specified time limits, otherwise those limits become essentially meaningless.”
• \[A]t least absent truly extraordinary circumstances . . . the basis for the second [Rule 60(b)] motion must be something other than that offered in the first.\
• Any Rule 60(b) motion raising substantially similar grounds as urged or as could have been urged in an earlier motion is successive, and any appeal from the denial of such motion is not reviewable.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).