James A. Halcomb v. Eric K. Shinseki

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the argument that use of the generic consent form established negligence per se because it did not list the foreseeable risks attendant with the treatment, and noting that the appellant had not presented any evidence — not even his own statement— that consent was not informed
• explaining the regulatory framework in detail

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).