Skip to main content
· 8/2/2005

James A. Frazier and Mantis Wildlife Films v. Roessel Cine Photo Tech

Citations

  • 417 F.3d 1230
  • 75 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1822
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 15888

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “this court has repeatedly 23 reaffirmed the proposition that [a]s a general rule, there is no duty to conduct a 24 prior art search, and thus there is no duty to disclose art of which an applicant 25 could have been aware”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Linn, Bryson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.