Jamas v. Krpan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding testimony that patient who knew significance of breast lumps due to past history of breast lumps and treating physician = s instruction to return to have breasts examined raised jury question regarding contributory negligence
• stating, A [o]nly where no reasonable evidence of contributory negligence has been presented can the trial court refuse to instruct the jury on the defense of contributory negligence @
• patient who knew significance of her history of breast lumps failed to reveal such history to physician performing breast examination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).