Jamar Allen v. State of Mississippi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “an appeal taken from any non- appealable interlocutory order does not divest a trial court of jurisdiction to proceed further in the matter” (citing, inter alia, Pa.R.A.P. 1701(b)(6)
• “Generally, for an order to be appealable, it must be (1) a final order…; (2) an interlocutory order appealable by right or permission…; or (3) a collateral order….”
• “[A] trial court may proceed further in any matter in which a non-appealable interlocutory order has been entered, notwithstanding the filing of a notice of appeal or a petition for review of the order”
• “[A] trial court may proceed further in any matter in which a non- appealable interlocutory order has been entered, notwithstanding the filing of a notice of appeal or a petition for review of the order.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).