Jamalur Rashid Chowdhury v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We must first determine whether there is any ambiguity in the statute using traditional tools of statutory interpretation. . . .”
• a conviction not specified in the NTA “cannot serve as an independent basis for affirming”
• “We must first determine whether there is any ambiguity in the statute using traditional tools of statutory interpretation. . . .”
• because alien’s “conspiracy conviction was not specified [as a ground of removability] in the Notice to Appear, [it] cannot serve as an independent basis for affirming the BIA’s decision” by triggering the jurisdictional bar at 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).