Jamal v. Thurmond

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Tjhere was evidence sufficient for the factfinder’s determination that [the claimant] intended not to complete the assignment and that he should have been aware that such a refusal subjected him to termination.”
• “On appeal to this Court, our duty is not to review whether the record supports the superior court’s decision but whether the record supports the initial decision of the local governing body or administrative agency.” (punctuation omitted)
• “On appeal to this Court, our duty is not to review whether the record supports the superior court’s decision but whether the record supports the initial decision of the local governing body or administrative agency.” (punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).