Jaksa v. Regents of University of Michigan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that student received due process despite the fact that the university’s hearing violated two procedures specified in the university’s “Manual of Procedures for the Academic Judiciary.”
• “[D]ue process is a flexible concept and will vary with the facts of each ease.... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).