Jakanna Woodworks, Inc. v. Montgomery County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the freedoms protected by Article 40 are co-extensive with those protected by the First Amendment
• explaining that the freedoms protected by Article 40 are co-extensive with those protected by the First Amendment
• the freedoms protected by Article 40 are coextensive with those protected by the First Amendment
• it is well established that freedoms protected by Article 40 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights are co-extensive with those protected by the First Amendment
• “the burden of proof rests on the County to prove that [the ordinance restricting speech] directly advances a substantial government interest and is not any more extensive than necessary to achieve that interest”
• \the burden of proof rests on the County to prove that [the ordinance restricting speech] directly advances a substantial government interest and is not any more extensive than necessary to achieve that interest\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).