· 5/2/2012
Jajeh v. County of Cook
Citations
- 678 F.3d 560
- 2012 WL 1522014
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 8900
- 95 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,503
- 114 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1441
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a hostile work environment claim was pleaded even though the complaint never used that term
- holding that no casual connection could be found when five months pass between the protected activity and the adverse employment action
- concluding that a five month gap between protected activity and adverse action did not amount to suspicious timing
- noting that budget cuts can pro- vide a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for an adverse employment action
- finding that “hostile-work-environment claim was properly raised in the complaint” even though “the complaint d[id] not use the words ‘hostile work environment’”
- noting that budget cuts can provide a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for an adverse employment action
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kanne, Sykes, and Hamilton, Circuit Judges
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.