Skip to main content
· 5/2/2012

Jajeh v. County of Cook

Citations

  • 678 F.3d 560
  • 2012 WL 1522014
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 8900
  • 95 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,503
  • 114 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1441

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a hostile work environment claim was pleaded even though the complaint never used that term
  • holding that no casual connection could be found when five months pass between the protected activity and the adverse employment action
  • concluding that a five month gap between protected activity and adverse action did not amount to suspicious timing
  • noting that budget cuts can pro- vide a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for an adverse employment action
  • finding that “hostile-work-environment claim was properly raised in the complaint” even though “the complaint d[id] not use the words ‘hostile work environment’”
  • noting that budget cuts can provide a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for an adverse employment action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kanne, Sykes, and Hamilton, Circuit Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.