Jairo Arango-Aradondo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that BIA must review ineffective assistance claim in first instance, either on appeal or through motion to reopen
• holding that a petitioner must raise an ineffective 2 assistance claim before the BIA in the first instance
• holding that petitioner must first raise ineffective assistance of counsel claim with the BIA
• finding that a petition for review was timely because the petitioner had “submit[ed] an affidavit verifying that he deposited his petition for review in [. . .] the [prison] mailbox”
• requiring ineffective assistance of counsel claims to be raised before the BIA in the first instance
• requiring exhaustion of constitutional claim 7 (ineffective assistance of counsel) because it “involve[d] procedural errors 8 correctable by the administrative tribunal” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).