Jain v. McFarland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating, in the medical malpractice context, that this court hesitates to disturb carefully crafted legislation that provides benefit to the parties, limits the burden on the courts, and reduces costs by discouraging frivolous litigation
• \Arguments of counsel are not evidence and do not establish the facts of the case.\
• \Arguments of counsel are not evidence and do not establish the facts of the case.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).