Skip to main content
· 11/3/2023

Jaimie Dawson v. Manuel Ojeda

Syllabus

The defendant, Manuel Ojeda, appealed a Family Court order allowing the plaintiff, Jaimie Dawson, to relocate permanently to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts with the minor child born as a result of their relationship. On appeal, defendant contended the Family Court's decision overlooked and misconceived material evidence when assessing the relocation. The Supreme Court affirmed the Family Court's decision, which properly considered the factors set forth in Dupré v. Dupré, 857 A.2d 242, 257 (R.I. 2004), and determined that the child's best interests were served by relocating with his mother, the plaintiff, permanently to Massachusetts. <br><br>

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.