Jaimez v. Daiohs USA, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “ ‘this lawsuit, and the difficulty and expense [the plaintiff has] encountered in attempting to reconstruct time and pay records,’ may well be ‘further evidence of the injury’ he has suffered.”
• “Labor Code § 226(e) was amended in 2013 to reflect legislative intent that the injury requirement not be stringent.”
• employees “must establish ‘actual injury’ arising from the receipt of inaccurate paystubs”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).