Skip to main content
· 1/31/2002

Jaimes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Citations

  • 53 P.3d 743
  • 2002 Colo. App. LEXIS 105
  • 2002 WL 122511

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the “owned but not insured” exclusion was void as against public policy
  • Referring to “the unambiguous language of the statute itself,” 11 the division explained “[s]ection 10-4-609(1)(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roy, Rothenberg, Taubman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.