Jagielski v. Package Machine Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding when one party only recently learns of another party’s involvement through no fault of their own, untimely joinder is permissible
• granting joinder motion and noting “we recognize that some degree of delay will result from any joinder. However, we do not believe that the case will be unduly delayed[.]”
• “‘mere inadvertence or carelessness’ is an insufficient basis for allowing late joinder”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bike v. American Motors Corp.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1984-02-27· cited 13×
• Struss v. Renault U.S.A., Inc.
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 1985-12-16· cited 4×
• Afif v. RMI Co.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1982-01-26· cited 3×
• United States v. New Castle County
  D. Delaware· 1986-07-17· cited 3×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Judd v. General Motors Corp.
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 1974-10-25· cited 14×
• Delco Wire & Cable Co. v. Keystone Roofing Co.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1978-09-27· cited 9×
• Oberholtzer v. Scranton
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1973-03-14· cited 8×
• Thompson v. Phillips Equipment & Supply Co.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1971-06-23· cited 6×
• Zielinski v. Zappala
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1979-04-30· cited 5×
• Carter v. Anika Manufacturing Corp.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1971-01-08· cited 5×