Jaffe ex rel. Jaffe v. Piagentine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding evidence of DUI was sufficient where officers testified to smelling alcohol on the defendant’s breath and noting indicia of intoxication
• determining that evidence was sufficient for DUI conviction where the defendant ran a stop sign, smelled of alcohol, had bloodshot and glassy eyes, refused to perform field sobriety tests, and refused a breath test
• holding evidence sufficient to establish DUI—general impairment where the - 12 - J-S80003-17 defendant “ran a stop sign, smelled of alcohol, had bloodshot and glassy eyes, was unsteady on his feet, refused to perform field sobriety tests, and refused a breath test”
• finding sufficient evidence to sustain Hartle’s conviction of DUI (general impairment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).