Jaedyn L. Clayburn v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• both assuming, arguendo, that the “material difference” standard of Treasury Regulation § 1.1001-1 applied to this situation, and that “R-49” loan pools are materially different as a matter of fact, thus, allowing the loss

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).