Jacqueline Stevens v. U.S. Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that being “deprived of the right to keep private the sensitive information about [one’s] person” is historically considered a harm protected by common law
• holding that “[w]hen a third party obtains [a] consumer’s credit report in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1681b(f
• holding that being “deprived of the right to keep private the sensitive 7 information about [one’s] person” is historically considered a harm protected by 8 common law
• holding that the Fair Credit 4 Reporting Act’s provision against obtaining a credit report for an unauthorized purpose is 5 a substantive provision, the violation of which confers standing
• holding in a similar context that the plaintiff must allege facts giving rise to a reasonable inference that a statutorily available affirmative defense does not apply
• holding that a plaintiff “has standing to vindicate her right to privacy under the FCRA when a third-party obtains her credit report without a purpose authorized by the statute, regardless whether the credit report is published or otherwise used by that third-party.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).