Jacqueline M. Sterling v. Southlake Nautilus Health

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the district court “correctly identified the claim before it, and its reframing of the claim did not violate Clisby”
• “It may be best practice for a district court to follow a ‘show your work’ approach by directly restating a movant’s claim and then laying out all analytical steps in addressing that claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).