Jacqueline Dejournett v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the plaintiff’s claim under the Fair Credit Reporting Act fell within the scope of an arbitration agreement in the defendant’s subscriber agreement and that the defendant could not have allegedly committed a tort but for the pre-existing agreement
• finding Plaintiff's FCRA claim related to a Subscriber Agreement and therefore fell within a broad Arbitration Provision
• plaintiff’s FCRA claims fell within the scope of the arbitration agreement because they related to the broader [agreement]
• “[T]here must be some direct relationship between the dispute and the performance of duties specified by the contract in order to find that the dispute arises out of, relates to, or is connected to the underlying agreement.” (cleaned up)
• “[T]here must be some direct relationship between the dispute and the performance of duties specified by the contract in order to find that the dispute arises out of, relates to, or is connected to the underlying agreement.” (cleaned up)
• compelling arbitration of FCRA claim that “relates to” contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).