Jacoby v. Bethlehem Suburban Motor Sales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that whether two entities were joint employers was a question of fact
• denying the motion to dismiss because \whether the [two defendants] were [the p]laintiff's joint employers is a question of fact\
• denying motion to dismiss because “whether the [two defendants] were [the p]laintiff's joint employers is a question of fact”
• finding centralized control of labor relations in part where the complaint alleged that a controlling company’s HR director investigated the plaintiff’s complaint, interviewed the plaintiff, and personally fired the plaintiff
• “whether the [two defendants] were [the p]laintiff’s joint employers is a question of fact”
• reporting of employees to separate firm supported finding of interrelation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).