Jacobson v. Union Story Trust & Savings Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that negotiations with a deceased’s liability insurance company and notice to the insurer that they would file suit if the matter was not settled did not meet the relation-back notice requirements of rule 1.402(5)
• stating the statute of limitations is not tolled by a person’s death unless otherwise provided by statute
• “Rule 89 [now rule 1.402] does provide authority for an amendment to a suit to relate back in time to the filing of the original suit.”
• \Rule 89 [now rule 1.402 ] does provide authority for an amendment to a suit to relate back in time to the filing of the original suit.\
• “[T]he trial court correctly granted the defendant bank summary judgment on the ground that suit was barred by the statute of limitations.”
• “A decedent does not have the capacity to be sued.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).