Jacobson v. Belplaza Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “this tort has only been applied in cases in which a third party sues an employer whose employee committed a tort”
• holding that employer had a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for difference in employees’ hours when “this other employee requested the additional hours”
• dismissing retaliation claim because the plaintiff could not show that the manager knew of the plaintiff’s protected activity
• “An at-will employee can claim promissory estoppel only if she can show a specific promise of job security.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).