Jacobs v. United States Supreme Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “‘[N]aked castings into the constitutional seas are not sufficient to command judicial consideration and discussion.’”
• \'[N]aked castings into the constitutional seas are not sufficient to command judicial consideration and discussion.'\ (alteration in original) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting State v. Johnson, 179 Wn.2d 534, 558, 315 P.3d 1090 (2014
• “ ‘[N]aked castings into the constitutional seas are not sufficient to command judicial consideration and discussion.’ ” (alteration in original; internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting State v. Johnson, 179 Wn.2d 534, 558, 315 P.3d 1090 (2014))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).