Jacobs v. the Florida Bar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting Supreme Court’s characterization of challenge as being as-applied when the plaintiff “alleged that but for the prohibition, he would engage in the prohibited behavior” (citation omitted)
• noting Supreme Court’s characterization of challenge as being as-applied when the plaintiff “alleged that but for the prohibition, he would engage in the prohibited behavior” (citation omitted)
• “[w]hen a plaintiff attacks a law facially, the plaintiff bears the burden of proving that the law could never be constitutionally applied.”
• plaintiffs had standing to challenge advertising restrictions because they intended to continue using past ads but had stopped because ads would violate new rules

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).