Skip to main content

Jacobs v. State

Citations

  • 640 N.E.2d 61
  • 1994 Ind. App. LEXIS 704
  • 1994 WL 268094

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the legislature “intended to broaden the traditional concept of the crime of forgery with the new statute.”
  • stating that potential injury is sufficient to prove intent to defraud

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garrard, Hoffman, Baker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.